Scientists Question ‘Statistically Impossible’ Russian Vaccine Results
Russia became the first country in the world to approve a COVID-19 vaccine called Sputnik V on Aug. 11, and has been criticized by the international medical community because the vaccine had yet to be tested in large-scale medical trials.
The “Sputnik V” is a vaccine developed by the Gamaleya National Center of Epidemiology and Microbiology in coordination with the Russian defense ministry.
The state-run Gamaleya Research Institute is one of Russia’s oldest vaccine research laboratories. It has been doing scientific research in its buildings since the Soviet era. The name Sputnik V itself became the pride of the Soviet Union after emerging from the 1957 Cold War satellite race.
The Russian Healthcare Ministry noted that the vaccine is based on one proven to work against adenovirus, the common cold, and is expected to provide immunity from SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, for up to two years.
Scientists in Russia and other countries are voicing concerns about the pace of development and the lack of transparency and say that offering the vaccine to the public before important final trials could pose a serious problem. Seventy-six patients were involved in the Phase-1 trial, too small an amount to determine if the Russian vaccine is safe and effective.
The Gamaleya Institute has been questioned by а group of scientists and doctors from 12 countries for information about the Sputnik V vaccine after they highlighted “strange patterns” in the data published in the leading British medical journal The Lancet a month ago.
The 37 prominent professionals requested access to the data to scrutinize it further and have signed an open letter outlining a number of concerns over an apparent duplication of results regarding antibody production in participants who were administered the vaccine in the first trial. They considered such duplication “highly improbable,” according to The Moscow Times.
The Gamaleya Institute has ignored the request and hasn’t responded to multiple public calls as well as at least two official proposals to obtain “raw anonymous information,” according to the group of researchers who first raised concerns.
Enrico Bucci, a biology professor at Temple University in the United States who first highlighted possible data duplication, said Russia’s public response failed to address his concerns and that he does not expect Russia to become “more transparent.”
Despite all this, TASS, a state news agency of Russia, said that the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), which funded the vaccine production, “received orders for exports of one billion vaccine doses from 20 countries.”
The agency further noted that public vaccination against the new coronavirus Sputnik V vaccine may begin in Russia in late October.
Russian President Vladimir Putin offered to all United Nations staff a free vaccine last month, however, the president himself hasn’t yet tried it.
In addition, the number of coronavirus infections in Russia has risen by 12,846 in the last 24 hours, the highest since the onset of the pandemic for the second consecutive day, the anti-coronavirus crisis center reported on Oct. 9.